[2026:RJ-JP:12263-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 227/2026 Krishna Printers, Having Its Registered Office At D-14, Sudarshanpura Industrial Area, Bais Godam, Jaipur-302016 Through Its Proprietor Pawan Kumar Sharma, Aged About 64 Years, S/o Kanhiya Lal Sharma, R/o 11/66, Duleshwar Garden, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Law And Legal Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority (Ralsa), Through Its Secretary, Vidhik Sewa Sadan, Vidhik Sewa Marg, Rajasthan High Court Campus, Jaipur - 302005 3. Director, Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority (Ralsa), Vidhik Sewa Sadan, Vidhik Sewa Marg, Rajasthan High Court Campus, Jaipur - 302005 4. M/s Premier Printing Press, Having Its Registered Office At 12 Ram Nagar, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur, Through Its Proprietor Ram Swaroop Mor, Aged About 75 Years, R/o C-158, Bahubali Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sanjay Sharma with Mr. Gautam Bhadodra For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 24/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that while the learned Single Judge has allowed the appellant to file required paperbook set, at the same time, treating the default on part of [2026:RJ-JP:12263-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-227/2026] the appellant, the interim order was vacated. He further submits that on account of default on part of the office of the lawyer, the appellant cannot be made to suffer. 2.. The order dated 07.03.2026 is under challenge before this Court. Surprisingly, the lawyer who is appearing in this appeal, is not the counsel who is appearing before the learned Single Judge in the writ petition which is pending. We would not entertain such kind of appeals before this Court. Moreover, we also notice that on 07.03.2026, the lawyer did not choose to appear before the learned Single Judge at his own will. The order passed by the learned Single Judge, therefore, cannot be said to be in any manner wrongful and no interference is required to be warranted. It is always open for the concerned writ petitioner to move appropriate second stay application, if his first stay was vacated on account of default. 3. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s) also stand dismissed. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ RAHUL MIRKHANI/8