ALICE ALBERT DSOUZA v. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
WP/3474/2026 · 2026-08-25
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4258 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4258 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
38-WP-3474-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3474 OF 2026 Alice Albert D’souza .....Petitioner Versus The Chief Executive Officer and Ors. .....Respondents ..... Ms. Drishti Khurana i/b Mr. Atif Shaikh, for the Petitioner. Mr. Dilip Vasu Poyyara i/b Ms. Uma Palsuledesai, for the Respondent- SRA. Mr. Amit Dubey a/w Mr. Sandeep Dubey, for the Respondent Nos.2 to
4. ..…
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
SANDESH D.PATIL, JJ. DATE : 25th AUGUST 2026 P.C.:-
1. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the Respondent-SRA and also
learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
3. The Petitioner had submitted a proposal to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (S.R.A) on 9th December, 2024 which was duly received by the S.R.A on 11th December, 2024. By the aforesaid letter dated 9th December, 2024 of the Petitioner, permission was sought from the Office of S.R.A. for the sale of Flat No.306 in the Manisha 1/3 MANISHA BALKRISHNA TALEKAR Digitally signed by MANISHA BALKRISHNA TALEKAR Date: 2026.08.27 10:54:25 +0530
38-WP-3474-2026.doc rehabilitation building no.3/A of the Respondent No.2-Society as per the Circular CR145 of S.R.A.
4.
Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2-Society submits that at the relevant time there was administrator who was holding charge of the Society. However, so far as their stand is concerned, they have nothing to state as regards to no objection for they recognize the Petitioner as the Member of the Society. Once the Respondent No.2- Society is recognizing the Petitioner as Member of the Society, the question of no objection from the Society does not arise as it is now for the S.R.A. to take an appropriate decision on the proposal which is received from the Petitioner dated 9th December, 2024.
5. In such view of the matter, the S.R.A. to decide the request made by the Petitioner vide the proposal dated 9th December, 2024 for transfer of the Petitioner’s flat bearing No.3/A, 3rd Floor, Shanti Nagar Rahivashi Society, in favour of the “Donee” Claude Dominic D’Souza under the Gift Deed dated 13th September, 2023 within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of the Order, without insistence of the no objection from the Respondent No.2- Society. The decision be communicated to the Petitioner. Manisha 2/3
38-WP-3474-2026.doc
6. If the S.R.A. wants the Petitioner to comply with any requisition, the same be communicated within a period of one week from the date of communication of this Order.
7. In view of above, Writ Petition No.3474 of 2026 stands
disposed of.
(SANDESH D.PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Manisha 3/3