Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4257 (KAR)

KARIYANNA v. CHAKKALA MUDLAPPA GARI KRISHTAPPA

MFA/6226/2023 · 2026-04-16

K Manmadha Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21124 MFA No. 6226 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6226 OF 2023 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. KARIYANNA S/O ERAKARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 2. SHIVAMMA, W/O KARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 3. SRIDHARA D.K, S/O KARIYANNA, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT: DINNEGOLLARAHATTI VILLAGE I.D. HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. &APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SATHISHA T.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHAKKALA MUDLAPPA GARI KRISHTAPPA S/O MUDLAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESIDING AT C/O. RADHAMMA, W/O. T. VENKATESH PATAHAGANAHALLI, KOLALA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT 3 572 129. Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21124 MFA No. 6226 of 2023 2. THE MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BALAJI TOWERS, 1ST FLOOR, ASHOKA NAGAR, B.H. ROAD, TUMAKURU. NOW REPRESENTED BY: THE MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE EAST WING NO.28, CENTENARY BUILDING, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 3 560 001. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ASHOKA H, FOR SRI. B. PRADEEP.,ADVOCATES FOR R2, R1-SERVED 3UNREPRESENTED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.20.05.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.1160/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MACT, TUMAKURU, SITTING AT MADHUGIRI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21124 MFA No. 6226 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for respondent No.2 are present. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo for withdrawal of this appeal. 3. The memo is taken on record. 4. This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21