Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42569 (MAD)

Tvl Sri Selvakumaran Enterprises v. Assistant Commissioner (ST)

WP/23540/2026 · 2026-06-30

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 23540 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 23540 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.25515 & 25516 of 2026 Tvl Sri Selvakumaran Enterprises Rep. by its proprietor MR.Kumaravel, No.22/3/3, 5th Street, Thiru Nagar, Vadapalani, Chennai - 600 026. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) Vadapalani assessment circle, no.1, greams road, ground floor, PAPJM Annex building, Chennai 600 026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent vide Reference No. ZD3312253607777 dated 23.12.2025 along with the detailed order as annexure and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Mansoor Ilahi R For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23540 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 23.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some recoveries were made pursuant to the impugned order. This aspect is required to be verified and confirmed. Subject to giving credit thereto, he submits that the petitioner would remit additional amounts so as to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand in the aggregate as a condition for remand. The counsel on record has made an endorsement to that effect on the bundle. 5. Subject to verifying and confirming that some amount was recovered and subject further to the condition that the petitioner remits additional amount https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23540 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 so as to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand in the aggregate within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand in the aggregate by the petitioner. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 30-06-2026 (2/4) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To Assistant Commissioner (ST) Vadapalani assessment circle, no.1, greams road, ground floor, PAPJM Annex building, Chennai 600 026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23540 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 23540 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.25515 & 25516 of 2026 30-06-2026 (2/4) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis