IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5043 of 2026 ====================================================== Bihar Adiwasi Adhikar Forum through its patron Pramod Kumar Singh, aged about 69 years, male, Resident of - Flat No.- A-22, R.D.Tower, New Punaichak, P.S.- Shastrinagar, District - Patna- 800023. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Land Reform and Revenue, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Inspector General, Registration, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Registration Officer cum Collector, Araria. 4. The Circle Officer, Raniganj, District-Araria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pinki Kumari For the Respondent/s : Mr.Advocate General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 01-05-2026 This Public Interest Litigation has been filed seeking following reliefs:- “(i) issuance of writ of mandamus for directing the respondent No. 1 i.e. the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Land Reform and Revenue, Government of Bihar to dispose of the representation dated 21.10.2025 as contained in annexure- P1 of this writ application in which the petitioner prays for protection of Government Land (Gair Majarua Khas) which Khata No.- 1279, Khesara No.- 4633, 4668, 4672, 4673 and 5101, area 279.49 acers, Thana No.-73, Mauza - Majhua, Circle- Raniganj, District- Araria. (ii) issuance of writ of mandamus for directing the respondent No.-3 i.e. the District Registration Officer cum Collector Araria to stop sale the land Patna High Court CWJC No. 5043 of 2026(2) dt.01-05-2026 2/2 declared as Gair Majarua Khas which Khata No.- 1279, Khesara No.- 4633, 4668, 4672, 4673 and 5101, area 279.49 acers, Thana No.-73, Mauza - Majhua, Circle- Raniganj, District- Araria. (iii) The petitioner also prays for the issuance of writ/writs, direction/ directions, order/orders in her favour in the fact and circumstances of this case.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that representation has been filed before the concerned authority, but no response has been received. 3. This is not the proper forum for invoking public interest litigation, seeking for a direction for disposal of the representation. 4. We are proposing to impose heavy cost on the petitioner, but with all warning not to repeat such activity, the writ petition stands dismissed. supratim/- (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ) (Harish Kumar, J) U