Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4256 (BOM)

SITARAM MARUTI PANSARE v. THE SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY (SRA)

WP/3994/2026 · 2026-08-25

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22 wp 3994 of 2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3994 OF 2026 Sitaram Maruti Pansare ... Petitioner versus The Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors. … Respondents Mr. Mutahhar Khan with Mr. Vishal Mehta, Ms. Manashvi Shah, Ms. Vidhi Shah i/by M/s. MV Law Partners, for Petitioner. Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar with Ms. Pallabi Chatterjee, Mr. Ohm Gandhi, for Respondent Nos.5 to 8. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 25 AUGUST 2026 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to prefer an appeal before the AGRC. 3. Leave granted with liberty as prayed for. 4. In the event, such an appeal is preferred, the AGRC is requested to decide the Appeal on its own merits and in accordance with law. 5. Mr. Ghadigaonkar submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of Respondent Nos.5 to 8 and undertakes to file vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos.5 to 8. Learned Counsel further submits that, for a period of four weeks, Respondent Nos.5 to 8 will not press for execution of the impugned order. ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 1/1 Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 27/08/2026 11:36:36