1/2 59-IA-2195-2026 (OS).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2195 OF 2026 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1962 OF 2018 Madan Doulatram Harjani ...Applicant In the matter between: Veenu Doulatram Harjani ...Deceased/ Respondent Versus Madan Doulatram Harjani ...Petitioner _______ Ms. Pranchali Kandre i/b APS Law Associates for the Applicant. _______ CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 18 th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. 1. This Interim Application seeks a post-grant amendment to the Schedule appended to the captioned Testamentary Petition. 2. Learned counsel points out that the captioned Testamentary Petition was filed for the issuance of Letters of Administration in respect of the properties and effects of one Veenu Doulatram Harjani. She submits that, by an Order dated 17 th June 2022, this Court granted the Applicant Letters of Administration. 3. She further submits that the only amendment sought in the Schedule is for deletion of the name of Mahesh Doulatram Harjani, one of the children of the deceased. Areeb MOHAMMAD AREEB MOHD AKBAR Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AREEB MOHD AKBAR Date: 2026.08.20 13:03:56 +0530 2/2 59-IA-2195-2026 (OS).DOC 4. She has invited my attention to a copy of the Will in respect of which Letters of Administration were granted and pointed out that the said flat was bequeathed only to the daughters of the deceased, namely, Vinal Dilip Bharvani and Sunita Harjani, in equal shares. 5. She submits that, due to inadvertence, the name of Mahesh Doulatram Harjani was also included in the Schedule of assets against the said flat. She has also placed before me the Consent Affidavits of the children of the deceased, namely, Mahesh Doulatram Harjani, Vinal Dilip Bharvani and Sunita Harjani, stating that they have no objection to the Grant being amended in terms of the reliefs sought in the present Interim Application. 6. Having heard learned counsel, perused the Interim Application and noted that there is no objection to the amendment sought, I am inclined to allow the Interim Application in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b), which read thus: “(a.) The Hon'ble Court be pleased to allow an amendment to Schedule I of the Petition in accordance with the draft Schedule 1 of Amendment annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit - D (b.) The office of Prothonotary and Senior Master of High Court Bombay be directed to accept the Original Grant dated 30.09.2022 and to issue amended Grant in terms of the amended Schedule - I of the Petition;” 7. In view of the above, the Interim Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Areeb