Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4254 (RAJ)

PARDEEP SON OF RAMMAHER, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN,

CRLMP/6992/2025 · 2026-03-27

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13070] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6992/2025 1. Pardeep Son of Rammaher, Resident of Budain, Jind, Ra- jasthan- 126115. 2. Sunil Son of Rammaher, Resident of Budain, Jind, Ra- jasthan- 126115. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Kaushal Kishore S/o Trilokchand, Aged About 45 Years, Resident of Kawai Salpura Tehsil Atru Police Station Atru District- Baran (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Saini For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Manish Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2026 1. By way of this Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.9/2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station (Baran), District Baran (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 420 & 120B of IPC and Section 66(D) of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000. 2. Complainant of this case is present in person and has duly been identified by his counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this petition, parties have entered into compromise. Counsel submits that due to compromise, further proceedings in [2026:RJ-JP:13070] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6992/2025] the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 and as such, the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.9/2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station (Baran), District Baran (Rajasthan) along with subsequent proceedings, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /463