Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4254 (JHR)

BHARAT ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./581/2026 · 2026-02-25

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5522 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.581 of 2026 ---- Bharat Oraon, aged about 32 years, Son of Jena Oraon, Resident of Village Kamati Pipratoli, P.O.-Tala, P.S.-Chanho, District – Ranchi …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 25th February, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant who is in custody since 28.01.2024 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.730 of 2025 arising out of Chanho P.S. Case No.161 of 2019, registered for the offence under Sections 385, 386 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code, under Sections 3/4 of Explosive Act and under Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, pending in the court of learned A.J.C.-XX, Ranchi. 3. Earlier the prayer for bail of the applicant has been rejected vide order dated 19.09.2025 passed in B.A. No.6203 of 2025. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the FIR has been lodged on 17.11.2019 for the incident dated 15.11.2019 but this applicant was in jail custody and also, he has been acquitted in another case but he has been remanded in the present case on 28.01.2024. He has been roped in this case on the confession of the co-accused although the petitioner was in custody. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two 2026:JHHC:5522 Page | 2 B.A. No.581 of 2026 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.J.C.-XX, Ranchi in connection with S.T. Case No.730 of 2025 arising out of Chanho P.S. Case No.161 of 2019, subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self- attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the trial court which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 25th February, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 26.02.2026