IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT M/s Hitesh Aggarwal Contractor State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Niman for the petitioner. Mr. Mr. Abhilaksh Gaind, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Roy, Advocate and Ms. Priya Jarial, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 7. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 7 submits that work in question stands allotted to M/s N M/s Dass Builders. In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition. Disposed of. April 30, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6797 Date of Decision : M/s Hitesh Aggarwal Contractor Regd. Through its Proprietor Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Nimanyu Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Additional A.G., Punjab Mr. Abhilaksh Gaind, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Roy, Advocate and Ms. Priya Jarial, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 7. DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 7 submits that work ion stands allotted to M/s N.K.C. Constructions Private Limited and M/s Dass Builders. In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6797 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.04.2026 Regd. Through its Proprietor …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI u Gautam, Advocate, Saurabh Kapoor, Additional A.G., Punjab Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 7 submits that work Constructions Private Limited and In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.05.05 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document