DHRUB MISHRA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REGISTRATION AND LAND REFORMS,
WPC/7771/2025 · 2026-01-21
Rajesh Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4253 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4253 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:1588 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.7771 of 2025
.... Dhrub Mishra aged about 55 years son of Amulya Mishra, resident of Village Tantri (North Tantri) P.O. Tantri, P.S. Jaridih, District-Bokaro (Jharkhand), representing himself as well as Amulya Mishra & Moti Mishra through Power of attorney
.… Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi
2. Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi
3. Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, P.O. and P.S. Bokaro, District-Bokaro
4. Additional Collector, Bokaro, P.O. and P.S. Bokaro, District-Bokaro
5. District Land Acquisition Officer, Bokaro, P.O. and P.S. Bokaro, District Bokaro
6. Circle Officer, Chas, P.O. and P.S. Chas, District-Bokaro
7. Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Chas, P.O. and P.S., District- Bokaro
.... Respondents
.... CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Pathak, Adv.
: Mr. Shashi Kant Mishra, Adv.
: Mr. Sandeep Verma, Adv. For the Resp.-State
: Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III
....
02/21.01.2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-
“For issuance of an appropriate Writ, Rule, Order, Direction upon the Respondent Authorities to enhance the award amount which has been prepared in the name of mother of the petitioner, without determining the compensation amount in accordance with the parameters prescribed under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition and Resettlement Act (In short LARR Act) and for such other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner is legally entitled to.”
2. It has been pointed out that alternative and efficacious remedy is available.
3. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate authority by invoking appropriate proceeding.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
21.01.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 22.01.2026