Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42522 (CAL)

MAMUDA BEGAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/9660/2020 · 2026-09-17

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.09.2026 Sl. No.1(DL) Ct. No.14 srm IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No. 9660 of 2020 Mamuda Begam Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Basudeb Mukherjee …for the Petitioner. 1. This matter is appearing in the list under the heading “To Be Mentioned”. 2. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that due to some inadvertent typographical error in the pleadings of the writ petition the petitioner seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file afresh. He files written instruction of the petitioner dated 15th September, 2026 which is taken on record. 3. In view of such submission, the writ petition being WPA 9660 of 2020 stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 5. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)