[2026:RJ-JP:12155] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13970/2025 Vishnu Jatav Son Of Ramkishore, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Gahlawata Police Station Khedli District Alwar. At Present In Central Jail Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14451/2025 Brijesh Jatav S/o Phool Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kalwadi, Police Station Khedli, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Jail At Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Biri Singh Sinsinwar, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Shivam Sharma Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Amitabh Jatav with Ms. Preeti Kumari Mr. Puneest Prajapat Ms. Ritika Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 23/03/2026 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused- applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 275/2025 registered at Police Station Kherli District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1) IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submit that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the matter. It is [2026:RJ-JP:12155] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13970/2025] submitted that applicants have no criminal antecedents registered against them. It is also submitted that applicants were not specifically named in the FIR. Furthermore, it is submitted that even eye witnesses has not categorically named the applicants. It is submitted that the test identification parade is also not supportive of the prosecution’s story. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. It is submitted that present is a heinous offence and the victim belongs to the SC/ST community. It is further submitted that there exist motive on part of the applicant towards the commission of the said offence. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the heinous offence of causing death of the victim, who belong to the SC/ST community have been levelled against the applicant; that prima facie there exist motive on part of the applicant towards the commission of the said offence, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow these bail applications of the accused-applicants. 5. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /40-41