Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4251 (KAR)

SRI K.V RAJSHEKAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9085/2026 · 2026-04-02

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 9085 OF 2026 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: 1. SRI K.V. RAJSHEKAR S/O VENKATA SUBBIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.185, DEVIKERE ROAD, KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE -570 010 2. SRI S ANANTH S/O SUBRAMANYA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.169, DEVIKERE ROAD, KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE -570 010 3. SRI L MOHAN S/O LATE LAKSHMI NARAYAN AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO.206, DEVIKERE ROAD, KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE -570 010 4. SRI BASAVANNA S/O LATE MAHADEVANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.175, THAYURU VILLAGE POST, BILIGER HOBLI, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 NANJUNGUDU TALUK, MYSORE-571 301 5. SRI D CHAMARAJU S/O LATE DEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT - NO 217, NAYAKARA BEEDI KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE - 570 010 6. SRI VIJAY BHASKAR S/O SUBRAMANYA B AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT - NO-191, DEVIKERE ROAD, KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE -570 010 7. SRI C LOKESH S/O CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT - NO-40, K.R MILLS COLONY, OLD ROAD, MYSORE - 570 010 8. SMT M B HARINI W/O RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO.276, KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE - 570 010 9. SRI K ANAND S/O BOMME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO.3, 6TH CROSS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 PAPANNA LAYOUT, YARAGANAHALLI MYSORE - 570 011 10. SRI P PURSHOTAM S/O R PARTHASARTHI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT -1497/98, N.S ROAD DEVARAJ MOHALLA, MYSORE - 570 001 11. SMT UMA MANI W/O R NAIDYMUTTU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT - NO-207, NAYAKARA BEEDI KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE 570 010 12. SRI J.B PRASSANA KUMAR S/O LATE BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT - NO-977, SEEBAYYANNA MANTI, BELAGOLA VILLAGE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA-571 606 13. SRI S SHASHIKUMAR S/O SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT - NO-37, NAYAKARA BEEDI KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE 570 010 14. SRI M HEMANTH KUMAR S/O MAHADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 R/AT - NO-37, NAYAKARA BEEDI KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS, MYSORE 570 010 15. SRI CHETAN S/O V NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT - NO 174/1, DEVIKERE ROAD KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE -570 010 16. SRI K.H. HEMANTH KUMAR S/O K.H HONGAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT - KENNALU VILLAGE, NEAR AIRTEL TOWER, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA - 571 435 17. SRI GOVINDA NAYAKA S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATA NAYAKA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT - NO 179, 2ND BLOCK, RAMABAINAGARA MYSORE - 570 008 18. SRI. VISHVESHWARA, S/O.PRABHAKAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, NO. 88, DEVIKERE ROAD KASABA HOBLI CHAMUNDI BETTA MYSORE - 570 010 19. SRI. D.S. HARISH S/O. SHANKAR AIYAR D. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, DEVIKERE ROAD KASABA HOBLI CHAMUNDI BETTA, MYSORE - 570 010 20. SRI. V. SUBRAMANYA DILIPA, S/O. S. VENKATARAMANAN AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NO.631, BEHIND NARAYANASWAMY TEMPLE, KASABA HOBALI, CHAMUNDI BETTA, MYSORE - 570 010 21. SRI. N. KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, NO. 219, UTTANAHALLI, VARUNA HOBLI HADAJANA POST MYSORE - 571 311 22. SRI. K. RAMU, S/O. LATE KALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.73, ELIGEHUNDI, POST UTTANEHALLI, MYSORE - 571 311 23. SRI.MALLIKARJUNA, S/O. ARCHAKA KAALAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.11, SHIVASHAKTI NILAYA, PANCHAGAVI MATHA, GOWRI SHANKARA NAGARA, MYSORE - 570 025 - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 24. SRI.MAHADEVA PRASAD, S/O. LATE PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, NO.189, ELIGEHUNDI, POST UTTANAHALLI, MYSORE - 571 311 25. SRI. M.G. SHRIDHAR, S/O. M.N. GANESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, LAXMI NIVASA, T.B.LAYOUT, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MELUKOTE, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 431 26. SMT. SUVARNAMMA, W/O. LATE DURGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.825/2, LOKARANJAN MAHAL ROAD, ITTIGE GUDU, MYSURU, MYSORE - 570 001 27. SMT. HEMAVATI, W/O. LATE RAJASHEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO.12, JANATA SWEET, KASABA HOBLI, CHAMUNDIBETTA, MYSORE - 570 010 28. SRI. H.Y. VEERABHADRA, S/O. LATE VAIKUNTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, WARD NO.22, CHIKKA AMBEDKAR NAGAR, HOLENARASIPURA, HASAN DISTRICT - 573 211 - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 29. SMT. NEELAMBIKA, W/O. MAHADEVASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.1130, BHAVANI STREET, ITTIGE GUDU, MYSORE - 570 010 30. SRI. M.K.PRAKASHMURTHY, S/O. M.R.KRISHNA BHATTAR, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, NO.1078, NARASARAJA ROAD, CHAMARAJAPURA, LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSORE - 570 022 31. SRI. V. SURYNARAYANA SHASTRI, S/O. LATE VENKATADRI SHASTRI, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, NO.2894/1, BASAVESHWARA ROAD, 2ND CROSS, CHAMUNDIPURA, MYSORE - 570 021 32. SRI. PACHAIAH, S/O. KADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO. 86/2, GOVT HOBALI VARUNA, POST-HADAJANA, UTTANAHALLI - 571 311 PETITIONERS NO. 1 TO 32 ARE WORKING IN VARIOUS CAPACITIES UNDER RESPONDENT NO-3 SHRI. CHAMUNDESHWARI KSHETRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY., &PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V. RAVI PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (MUJARAI) M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE - 560 018 3. THE SECRETARY SHRI CHAMUNDESHWARI KSHETRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHAMUNDI HILLS MYSORE - 570 010 &RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. AMARAVATHY H.R., AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURE E, 27/11/2025 TO THIS WRIT PETITION WITHIN TIME BOUND PERIOD AS DEEMED FIT BY THIS HON'BLE COURT CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The captioned petition is filed alleging inaction on the part of the respondents, who have failed to consider the petitioners' representation dated 27.11.2025, vide Annexure-E. 2. Facts leading to the case are as under: Learned Additional Government Advocate, though seeks time to obtain instructions, this Court is not inclined to grant any adjournment in the matter. This Court has, on several occasions, deprecated the practice of authorities keeping representations submitted by citizens pending for an indefinite period without any decision. Such inaction on the part of the State and its instrumentalities compels citizens to approach this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus. The conduct of the respondents in sitting over the - 10 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 petitioners9 representations reflects palpable administrative apathy and inaction. 3. It is trite that when a representation is submitted invoking a statutory or legal right, the concerned authority is under a corresponding obligation to consider and decide the same within a reasonable time. The petitioners herein are asserting a claim for parity in pay scale based on the Government Order dated 17.07.2019, published in the official gazette and produced at Annexure-A. Whether the benefit flowing from the said notification is applicable to the petitioners or not is a matter that squarely falls within the domain of the respondent-authorities and requires due consideration on merits. 4. In the present case, despite submission of representations dated 23.04.2025 and 27.11.2025, the respondents have failed to take any decision. Such inaction cannot be countenanced. The petitioners, being employees working under the authority, have a legitimate - 11 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 expectation that their grievances would be duly examined and addressed in accordance with law. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the inaction on the part of the respondents warrants interference and this is a fit case for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing consideration of the petitioners9 representation in accordance with law. 5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court passes the following: ORDER i. The writ petition is hereby allowed; ii. A writ in the nature of mandamus is issued directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioners9 representation dated 27.11.2025 produced at Annexure3E, in accordance with law; iii. While considering the said representation, the respondents shall specifically examine the - 12 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17978 WP No. 9085 of 2026 claim of the petitioners for extension of benefit under the Government Notification dated 17.07.2019 produced at Annexure3A, and determine the petitioners9 entitlement thereto; iv. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within an outer limit of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order; v. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim, and all contentions of the parties are kept open. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6