Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4250 (BOM)

Vijaylaxmi R Shukla v. A B S Enterprises

ARBP/402/2026 · 2026-08-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/2 503-ARBP-402-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 402 OF 2026 Vijaylaxmi R. Shukla ...Petitioner Versus A B S Enterprises ...Respondent _______ Ms. Nidhi Karkhanis h/f Ajinkya Jaibhave for the Petitioner. Ms. Anushka Shetty i/b MLS Vani & Associates for the Respondent. _______ CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 18 th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. 1. This is the Petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and seeks an extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal to complete the arbitration proceedings and pass an arbitral award. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent, does not have any objection to the time being extended. 3. I am informed that the arbitration proceedings are at the stage of final arguments. In my view, the substantive interest of justice would best be served if the time is extended. The Tribunal shall endeavour to complete the arbitration proceedings within extended time, for which purpose both parties are directed to cooperate. 4. Accordingly, the Petition is allowed is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘a’, which reads thus: Areeb MOHAMMAD AREEB MOHD AKBAR Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AREEB MOHD AKBAR Date: 2026.08.20 13:03:55 +0530 2/2 503-ARBP-402-2026.DOC “(A) Allow the petition and extend the mandate of the Ld. Arbitral Tribunal constituted in pursuance of the order dated 06/11/2023 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Arbitration Application (L) No. 26563 of 2023 till the 31st day of December, 2026.” 5. Time is extended from the date on which a copy of this order is uploaded. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Areeb