Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4249 (CHH)

PRABHAT RAJ DUBEY v. KIRTI RAJ DUBEY

WP227/667/2021 · 2026-04-08

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16517 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 667 of 2021 1 - Prabhat Raj Dubey S/o Late Chandrbhan Dubey Aged About 62 Years R/o 9/a Saket Colony Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Kirti Raj Dubey S/o Late Chandrbhan Dubey Aged About 58 Years R/o Mig 13 Mukut Nagar Durg, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sangeet Raj Dubey S/o Late Chandrbhan Dubey Aged About 56 Years Through Doctor Nita Sharma Residence Quarter Number 3 Road Nuber 14 Sector 9 Bhilai Nagar Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parth Kumar Jha, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Vinod Tekam, Government Advocate for the State SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.04.10 14:40:40 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 09/04/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter has been compromised between the parties, therefore, he does not want to press the instant writ petition. 2. The submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the respondent counsel. 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit