Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4249 (BOM)

PRADEEP ALIAS KACHRU PARUBA BANSOD AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1466/2026 · 2026-08-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

927ba1466-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1466 OF 2026 Pradeep Alias Kachru Paruba Bansod And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Mr. Ghanekar Nilesh S., Advocate for Applicants Ms. Ashlesha Deshmukh, APP for Respondent State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 21st August, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The application is preferred at the pre charge sheet state. The offence is serious, in which, the deceased has died due to brutal assault at the hands of the present applicants. The Applicant was heard on merits and with the assistance of learned APP, investigation papers were perused. Upon showing its disinclination to allow the application, the learned Advocate for the applicants, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the application with liberty to file fresh application after filing of the charge-sheet. 3. Leave as prayed is granted. The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. 4. If the applicant prefers the fresh bail application alongwith charge-sheet before the trial court, then the trial court shall consider it on its own merits, in accordance with law. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:38169