[2026:RJ-JP:13726] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4588/2019 1. Ajay Son Of Ramphool, Resident Of Bad, Police Station Sadar, Tehsil Hindaun, Distt. Karauli, Raj. 2. Vijay Son Of Kedar, Resident Of Bhallabhgarh, Tehsil Bhusawar, Distt. Bharatpur. 3. Bhag Singh Son Of Shri Chigga, Resident Of Bad, Police Station Sadar, Tehsil Hindaun, Distt. Karauli, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Smt. Savitri Wife Of Shri Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Bhayalawas, Bhallabhgarh, Tehsil Bhusawar, Distt. Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.K. Sharma for Mr. S. Gaharana For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy. GA JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/04/2026 1. By way of filing the instant petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned FIR No. 181/2019 registered with the Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 366, 376-D & 379 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prosecutrix habitually files false complaints in order to demand money from the persons, hence, she is abusing the process of law, in fact no such incident has occurred, but the petitioners have [2026:RJ-JP:13726] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4588/2019] been falsely booked in the instant case, hence, interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that after investigation in the instant matter, charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioners under Sections 366 & 376-D IPC on 20.01.2026 before the Concerned Court, hence, interference of this Court is not warranted. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Perusal of the contents of the impugned FIR and the allegations levelled therein reveals commission of cognizable offence and the correctness of the allegations cannot be examined/adjudged by this Court while exercising inherent jurisdiction contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as certainly, this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer who has already found a prima facie case against the petitioners, that is why charge-sheet has been submitted against them for the above stated offences. 6. This Court is of the view that the petitioners would be at liberty to take all available grounds and defense which have been taken before this Court, at appropriate stage of the trial before the Concerned Court. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/10