Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42447 (PAT)

RENU DEVI v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./86999/2025 · 2026-01-15

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86999 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2025 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. RENU DEVI, W/o- Manoj Kumar Sah @ Manoj Sah R/v- Govindpur Khajuri Ps- Kalyanpur District- Samastipur 2. Nisha Kumari @ Nisha Sahu, D/o- Manoj Kumar Sah @ Manoj Sah R/v- Govindpur Khajuri PS- Kalyanpur District- Samastipur 3. Vikash Kumar, S/o- Manoj Kumar Sah @ Manoj Sah R/v- Govindpur Khajuri, PS- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 75, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per prosecution case, co-accused Manoj Sah misbehaved with the grand-daughter of the informant, on protest, co-accused Manoj Sah started assaulting informant and other family members. Thereafter, all the petitioners assaulted informant and his son. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the parties are agnates and there is case and counter case between the parties. Specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Manoj Sah. Petitioners are family members of co- accused Manoj Sah and there is general and omnibus Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86999 of 2025(3) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 allegation against all these petitioners. The allegation of snatching chain from the neck of the informant’s son is ornamental in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners is allowed. Let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Samastipur in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. khushbu/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T