- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010112372017 NC: 2026:KHC:51213 WP No. 46671 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 46671 OF 2017 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: ANANDAPPA S/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O GEJJEGUPPE VILLAGE, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562135 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V MUNIRAJ., ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING,DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SIR.M.VISVESWARAYA TOWER, PHODIUM BLOCK, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561203 Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010112372017 NC: 2026:KHC:51213 WP No. 46671 of 2017 4. THE TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK, DEVANAHALLI-562110 5. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA S/O YERRAPPA. AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 6. SMT.RATHNAMMA D/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 5 AND 6 ARE R/OF DHARMAPURA VILLAGE, VIJAYAPURAHOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562135 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. T.K.RAJAGOPALA, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010112372017 NC: 2026:KHC:51213 WP No. 46671 of 2017 As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 23.06.2026 and 06.08.2026, on those days, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petition is listed today. A perusal of the petition papers would reflect that the petition is filed in 2017. Now we are in 2026. The petition is pending for nine years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30