Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010125022022 NC: 2026:KHC:51853 WP No. 6108 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 6108 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
M/S. BONUM CIBUM (A PARTNERSHIP FIRM SET UP UNDER THE PARTNERSHIP ACT) REP. BY NARASIMHAN P, PARTNER FLAT NO.003, BLDG. 10, SHANTHI PARK APARTMENTS, NO.44/4, DISTRICT FUND ROAD JAYANAGAR 9TH BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 069. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KIRAN B.S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
MR. C. RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS PROPRIETOR, SRI GANESH BHAVAN, S/O SRI. C. GANESH R/A NO.646 (10), TP KAILASAM ROAD, 6TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS HANUMANTHANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 019.
2.
THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NO. 73/1, GROUND FLOOR,
Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010125022022 NC: 2026:KHC:51853 WP No. 6108 of 2022
GANDHI BAZAAR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 004.
3.
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 73/1, GROUND FLOOR GANDHI BAZAAR MAIN ROAD BENGALURU - 560 004.
4.
THE SUB REGISTRAR WHWC+2V6, 1ST FLOOR OPPOSITE TO ROTI GHAR GANDHI BAZAAR MAIN ROAD, GANDHI BAZAAR, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS SUB REGISTRAR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DECLARE THAT THE PETITIONER-DECREE HOLDER IS ENTITLED TO THE ATTACHMENT OF MONIES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF ANY AUCTION-SALE BY R2 AND 3 AS PER ANNEXURE-A TOWARDS THE DECREE AMOUNT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANNX-B AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010125022022 NC: 2026:KHC:51853 WP No. 6108 of 2022
ORAL ORDER
Captioned petition is filed seeking following reliefs:
"WHEREFORE, for the above reasons and grounds, and on such other reason(s), ground(s) as may be urged and advanced at the time of Final Hearing, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Prohibition, Quo Warranto or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction:
A) DECLARING that the Petitioner-Decree Holder is entitled to the attachment of monies from the proceeds of any auction-sale by Respondent No.2 & 3 as per Annexure-A towards the decree amount; in accordance with Annexure-B.
B) DIRECTING the jurisdictional Sub-Registrar i.e., Respondent No.4 to register an encumbrance against the said property in favour of the Petitioner till the disposal of this petition.
C) RESTRAINING the Respondent No.2-Bank & Respondent No.3-Officer from issuing the Certificate of Sale to any successful bidder till the adjudication of this petition.
D) GRANTING all other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, proper and necessary under the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. The petitioner, placing reliance on the agreement executed by respondent No.1 in respect of transfer of the project, is before this Court seeking the aforesaid reliefs,
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010125022022 NC: 2026:KHC:51853 WP No. 6108 of 2022
including a writ of prohibition and quo warranto. However, the material on record discloses that respondent No.1– borrower had already mortgaged the subject properties in favour of respondent No.2–Bank by deposit of title deeds on 07.12.2012. Respondent No.1 has also executed a registered memorandum of mortgage of title deeds in favour of respondent No.2–Bank. In view of the subsisting mortgage created in favour of respondent No.2–Bank, the petitioner, merely on the strength of the alleged transfer of the project in its favour, cannot seek to assert any right in derogation of the secured interest of respondent No.2– Bank.
3. If the petitioner has obtained any order or decree from a competent Court recognising its claim against respondent No.1 and such claim is made subject to satisfaction of the dues of respondent No.2–Bank, it is open for the petitioner to work out its remedies in accordance with law. The present writ petition was
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010125022022 NC: 2026:KHC:51853 WP No. 6108 of 2022
instituted in the year 2022 and admittedly no interim
order has been granted by this Court. The petitioner has also not placed before this Court any subsequent development with regard to the recovery proceedings initiated by respondent No.2–Bank or the status thereof. In the absence of such material, this Court cannot issue any direction which would have the effect of interfering with the secured interest of respondent No.2–Bank.
4. The petitioner, however, is reserved liberty to assert its claim in accordance with law, if, upon conclusion of the recovery proceedings, respondent No.2–Bank has recovered the entire amount legally due and any surplus remains thereafter. In such an eventuality, it is open for the petitioner to approach respondent No.2–Bank and work out its remedies in accordance with law. The measures initiated by respondent No.2–Bank under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,
- 6 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010125022022 NC: 2026:KHC:51853 WP No. 6108 of 2022
2002 cannot, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, be interdicted or questioned by seeking a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, particularly when the petitioner has an efficacious remedy available under the statutory framework.
5. Likewise, no direction can be issued to the jurisdictional Sub-Registrar to register an encumbrance over the subject properties in favour of the petitioner. The records disclose that respondent No.2–Bank had already obtained a registered mortgage over the subject assets and its secured interest has precedence over the subsequent claim asserted by the petitioner. The petitioner, therefore, cannot seek registration of an encumbrance so as to prejudice or defeat the subsisting security interest of respondent No.2–Bank.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to work out its remedies in accordance with law in the event any surplus
- 7 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010125022022 NC: 2026:KHC:51853 WP No. 6108 of 2022
remains after full satisfaction of the dues legally recoverable by respondent No.2–Bank.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2