RAJENDRA PRASAD KESHRI @ RAJENDRA KESHRI v. State Of Bihar and Anr
CR. MISC./62878/2018 · 2026-01-31
Sunil Dutta Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42429 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42429 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62878 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-357 Year-2016 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad Keshri @ Rajendra Keshri Son of Sri Kanharia Lal Keshri, resident of Village/Mohalla- Churi Patti, Madhubani, P.S. K. Hat, Madhubani, District- Purnia. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. State Of Bihar.
2. Dilip Keshri, Son of Harihar Prasad Keshri, Resident of Village- Bakhari, P.S. Bakhari, District- Begusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 31-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 24.08.2018 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-2, Purnea in Sessions Trial No.28 of 2018 arising out of K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case No.357 of 2016 by which learned Court concerned had rejected the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. for discharge.
3. As per the report submitted by the Office, the Sessions Trial No.28 of 2018 arising out of K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case No.357 of 2016 has already been disposed of and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62878 of 2018(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/2 petitioner has already been acquitted vide judgment dated
13.01.2021.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner has already been acquitted and this case has become infructuous, accordingly, prays that the present case may be
disposed of.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties and the report submitted by the concerned Court, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed of having become infructuous.
Ritik/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T