Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2026:UHC:1886
BA2 No.15 of 2026 Shahid Malik Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Priyanshu Gairola, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State.
3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.232 of 2024 under Section 8/21/29 of NDPS Act, P.S. Nehru Colony, District Dehradun.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. This is second bail application. First bail application was rejected by this Court vide order dated
26.03.2025.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
7. All the facts, as narrated in the instant FIR, have already been dealt with in the first bail application. Thus, at this stage no new ground is found to entertain the second bail application.
8. Accordingly, second bail application is rejected.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
18.03.2026 Arti