Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42401 (PAT)

Neeraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./82988/2025 · 2026-01-05

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82988 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2025 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Neeraj Kumar S/o Rampati Ram R/o Village - Khurmabad, P.S - Chenari, District - Rohtas 2. Sonu Kumar S/o Rampati Ram R/o Village - Khurmabad, P.S - Chenari, District - Rohtas 3. Prabha Kumari D/o Rampati Ram R/o Village - Khurmabad, P.S - Chenari, District - Rohtas 4. Mukesh Kumar S/o Rampati Ram R/o Village - Khurmabad, P.S - Chenari, District - Rohtas 5. Rampati Ram S/o Late Bigu Ram R/o Village - Khurmabad, P.S - Chenari, District - Rohtas 6. Jamuni Devi W/o Rampati Ram R/o Village - Khurmabad, P.S - Chenari, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Rabindra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, on 03.06.2025 at about 7 AM, when the informant and his wife went to fetch water from hand-pump, in the meantime, all the F.I.R. named accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82988 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/3 persons, including these petitioners, started teasing his wife and on protest, all of them assaulted informant with stick and rod due to which informant’s eye, chest and back got hurt. It is further alleged that the accused persons also assaulted wife of informant. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Both parties are next door neighbours and due to petty dispute, scuffle took place. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. All sections are bailable except Section 74 of the B.N.S. which is supper-addition. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and general and omnibus nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82988 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 3/3 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-VII-cum- Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 226 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T