Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4240 (CHH)

SHEFALI SINHA v. THE REGISTRAR, SURGUJA UNIVERSITY

WPS/3953/2018 · 2026-04-01

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15306 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3953 of 2018 * - Shefali Sinha D/o Shri S. K. Sinha, Aged About 25 Years R/o Professor Quarter, Banaras Road, Ambikapur, P. S. Gandhi Nagar, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - The Registrar, Surguja University, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - The Surguja University, Through Vice- Chancellor, Surguja, University, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. V. Jayant Kumar, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 02/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner for its kind perusal. 10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the advertisement dated 21.04.2018 (Annexure P-1) published by the respondent no. 1 for the post of Assistant Professor (Electrical Engineers). 10.3 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to modify the advertisement dated 21.04.2018 (Annexure P-1) and create female quota for unreserved category in term of rule 3 of Rules 1997. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.04 11:22:24 +0530 2 10.4 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as if may deem fit and appropriate. 10.5 Cost of the petition may also be given.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. V. Jayant Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti