Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 424 (JK)

DEVINDER SINGH CHARAK v. UT OF J AND K TH FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/675/2026 · 2026-03-24

Ma Chowdhary

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No.675/2026 CM No.1530/2026 Devinder Singh Charak (67 yrs) S/O M.S Charak R/O H.No.245-B, Puran Nagar, Post Office Lane, New Plot, Rehari Mohalla, Jammu (J&K). ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Meyank Gupta, Adv. V/s 1. Union Territory of J & K through Financial Commissioner (Rev), Jammu. 2. Divisional Commissioner, Jammu. 3. Deputy Commissioner, Jammu. 4. Tehsildar Bishnah, Jammu. 5. Patwari Halqa, Salehar, Tehsil Bishnah, Jammu. ….Respondent(s) Through :- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER 24.03.2026 1. Petitioner, through the medium of this petition, seeks the following reliefs: “I. Direction to respondents, particularly, respondent Nos.4 & 5 to issue relinquishment fards in favour of petitioner forthwith; II. Pass any order deemed fit in the interest of justice. III. Award costs of the present petition in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject land measuring 16 Kanals and 17 Marla comprising of Khasra No.1150 situated at Sr. No. 04 2 WP(C) No.675/2026 Village Salehar, Tehsil Bishnah, Jammu, is recorded in the names of three co- sharer, namely, Maharaj Singh Charak, Shamsher Singh Charak and Suraj Prakash Singh, each having equal share as reflected in the Jamabandi; and that after the death of Maharaj Singh Charak, Suraj Prakash singh intends to transfer the land in favour of the petitioner, however, the revenue authorities have not issued fard intikhab in his favour for relinquishment. Petitioner claims to have submitted a representation to the respondents on 10.10.2025 for the same, but alleged that till now, the respondents have not issued fard in his favour. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall be satisfied, in case, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, with a direction to the respondents, to consider representation dated 10.10.2025, contended to have been submitted by the petitioner, and take a decision thereon within certain time frame. 4. In view of the pleadings and submissions urged by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is, disposed of, at its threshold, with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 10.10.2025 submitted by the petitioner and take a decision in this regard, as per the time-line prescribed under the Public Services Guarantee Act, from the date certified copy of this order is made available to them. 5. Disposed of, as above, along with connected application. Jammu: 24.03.2026 Surinder ) (M A Chowdhary) Judge Surinder Kumar 2026.03.05 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document