MUKESH GANJHU ALIAS MUKESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9042/2025 · 2026-01-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 424 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 424 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:575] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 9042 of 2025
Mukesh Ganjhu @ Mukesh Kumar, aged about 25 years, son of Krishna Ganjhu, resident of Village Sanghari, P.O. & P.S. Sadar (Chatra), District Chatra
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar ,Adv. For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, PP
05 / 09.01.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sessions Trial Case no. 112 of 2025 arising out of Chatra (Sadar) P. S. case no. 44 of 2025 instituted under Section 64 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed rape upon the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and till now, only one witness has been examined in this case namely Dr. Cinderella Balmuchu as Pw1 but she has categorically stated that the medical examination of the victim, did not confirm the rape of the victim and there was no external or internal injury on the private part of the victim. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 05.02.2025 , as mentioned in para 17 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the
case hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the trial court is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Chatra in connection with Chatra (Sadar) P. S. case no. 44 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 09.01.2026
Smita/-