IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20743 of 2018 ====================================================== Anil Kumar Choudhary Son of Late Satya Narayan Choudhary, Resident of Village- Nikaspur, Ward No.9, P.S.- Ujiarpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 4. The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms D.C.L.R., Samastipur. 5. The Circle Officer, Samastipur. 6. The Circle Inspector, Samastipur. 7. The Halka Karamchari, Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Praveen, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha -SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 13-01-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “A) For the issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders direction/directions to the Respondent authorities for Mutation of Petitioner's 1/3 share (10 Dhur) on his name from the Total land having (Tauzi No.-4430, Thana No.-179, Khata No.-268, Khesra No.-554, Total Area of Land - 1 katha and 10 dhur) on the name of petitioner's father late Satya Narayan Choudhary. Patna High Court CWJC No.20743 of 2018(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/2 B) For the issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction /directions to the respondent authorities to complete the all formalities required before mutation within a reasonable period because the land is question has been purchased in the year 1980 by the father of petitioner namely Satya Narayan Choudhary by a registered sale deed dated 25.08.1980. Land in question is in peaceful possession of petitioner and other co-sharers for last about 38 years. C) For any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled under the facts and circumstances of the present case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Kumar Praveen submits that the grievance stands redressed and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U