RUMIJA @ RUNIJA W/O KAIK MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/17009/2025 · 2026-03-18
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4238 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4238 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11509] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17009/2025 Rumija @ Runija W/o Kaik Mohammad, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Musakheda, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal- Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Khairthal-Tijara). ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For State(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP For Complainant : Ms. Jamsi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 18/03/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 479/2025 registered at Police Station Kishangarh Bas District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) under Section 103(1) of BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a female, aged about 20 years. It is submitted that heinous allegations of killing her own infant, aged approximately 9 months have been levelled against the applicant. It is further contended that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and the trial will take its own time to conclude. It is next submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. It is also submitted there was no presence of motive on part of the applicant rather the applicant has falsely been implicated in the matter by her in laws/complainant as they
[2026:RJ-JP:11509] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17009/2025] were carrying out atrocities qua the applicant and doubting the applicant of having an illicit relationship. Moreover, it is submitted that even the applicant left her matrimonial house and the delivery of the child has also taken place at her parental house. Lastly, it is submitted that on account of compromise with her in- laws, the applicant was residing at her matrimonial house.
3. Per contra, learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the instant bail application and submitted that the applicant was in an illicit relationship and on account of the same, the applicant killed her own child.
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering that the applicant is a female, aged about 20 years; that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take its own time to conclude; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge her on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Rumija @ Runija W/o Kaik Mohammad shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/33