Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4238 (BOM)

Sandhya Wo Venkatrao Kandharkar and ors v. Sapana Bapurao Ratolikar and ors

CA/9414/2026 · 2026-08-20

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) 994 ca 9415.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 994 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9415 OF 2026 IN SAST/668/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9414 OF 2026 SANDHYA VENKATRAO KANDHARKAR AND ORS VERSUS SAPANA BAPURAO RATOLIKAR AND ORS ….. Advocate for the Applicants : Ms. P. G. Sontakke ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 20.08.2026 P.C.:- 1. This is an application for granting stay to the execution of the impugned judgment and decree. 2. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants. 3. Considering the peculiar set of facts, there shall be ad interim relief in terms of prayer clause-B on the condition that the applicants shall deposit 50% of the amount along with accrued interest thereon in this Court within four weeks. If the amount is not deposited within four weeks, the ad interim relief granted by this Court shall be vacated. 4. Issue show cause notice to the respondents as to why the ( 2 ) 994 ca 9415.26 application should not be allowed in terms of prayer clause-B. Stand over 24.09.2026. 5. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. Civil Application for delay: 6. This is an application for condonation of delay of 40 days caused in filing the appeal. 7. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocate for applicants. 8. On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. 9. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. Appeal be registered. Appeal: 10. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 24.09.2026. [SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.] mubashir