Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4237 (AP)

N. SUBBALAXMAMMA v. N. HEMA AND 5 OTHERS

FCA/288/2009 · 2026-07-05

Battu Devanand, Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for judgment : Date of Pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of Upload : 07.07.2026 APHC010259572009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 288 OF 2009 Between: 1. N. SUBBALAXMAMMA, W/o. N. Sriramulu TTD Employee R/o. D.No. 8/106, NTR Colony, Near Bairagipatteda, Tirupati ...Petitioner AND 1. N HEMA AND 5 OTHERS, D/o. N. Sekhar Mino rep. by Mother N. Sridevi 2. N Sridevi, W/o. N. Sekhar Deponent R/o. CHenchuraju kandriga Village, Govardhanagiri Post, 3. N Damu, S/o. N. Sriramulu Driver R/o. D.No. 8/106, NTR Colony, Near Bairagipatteda Tirupati 4. N Sekhar, S/o. N. Sriramulu Business R/o. D.No. 8/106, NTR Colony, Near Bairagipatteda Tirupati 5. N Venkatadri, S/o. N. Sriramulu Driver R/o. D.No. 8/106, NTR Colony, Near Bairagipatteda Tirupati 2 6. N Sriramulu, TTD Employee R/o. D.No. 8/106, NTR Colony, Near Bairagipatteda Tirupati, Chittoor District. ...Respondents Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 386 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 42 days in filing the FCA against the order and decree dated 18.02.2009 in FCOP.No. 72/2006 on the file of the Family Court cum V Addl. District Judge, Tirupati IA NO: 2 OF 2009(FCAMP 570 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings relating to the FCOP.No. 72/2006 on the file of the Family court cum V Additional District Judge, Tirupati pending disposal of the appeal Counsel for the Petitioner: V ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondents: V JAGAPATHI The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 288 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Sri V. Tarun Kumar Chowdary, learned counsel, representing Sri V. Eswaraiah Chowdary, learned counsel for the appellant on record, represents that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this appeal, this appeal has become infructuous. 2) The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record. 3) Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous. 4) There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND _________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM Dated: 06.07.2026 PGR Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 288 OF 2009 Dt. 06.07.2026 PGR