Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42350 (MAD)

Boominathan v. The Superintendent of Police,

WP Crl.(MD)/3301/2026 · 2026-06-19

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP CRL.(MD). No.3301 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 19/06/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI WP CRL.(MD). No.3301 of 2026 Boominathan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, District of Police, Madurai Madurai District. 3. Anand 4. Nihya 5. Nandhavanam ... Respondents PRAYER :- To issue Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1 and 2 particularly the second respondent to take appropriate legal action on the Petitioner`s complaint dated 11.05.2026. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3301 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr. R. Murugappan, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1 and 2 particularly the second respondent to take appropriate legal action on the Petitioner`s complaint dated 11.05.2026. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had sent a representation seeking to take action against the respondents 3 to 5, who have cheated the petitioner by receiving a sum of Rs.15 Lakhs and giving a false promise of arranging job to the petitioner in abroad. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition was filed. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3301 of 2026 3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that no complaint has been received by the respondent police from the petitioner. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the respondents 3 to 5, notice to them is dispensed with. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the petitioner is directed to give a fresh complaint to the respondent police. If any complaint is received, the second respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.05.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3301 of 2026 6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 19.06.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no pnn To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, District of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3301 of 2026 L. VICTORIA GOWRI, J pnn ORDER IN WP CRL.(MD). No.3301 of 2026 Date : 19/06/2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis