Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010627792017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3834/2017 Between: 1. M/S.KAPIL CHIT FUNDS PVT LTD, O/O.VIJAYAWADA-I. BRANCH REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER B.SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.RAMA RAO O/O.A-94, J.J.NAGAR, NEREDMET, SECUNDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PILLA UMA SHANKAR, S/O.SUNNI BABU, OCC: BUSINESS R/O.GF- 4, VARSHA TOWERS, BRAHMA RAJU STREET, MUTYALAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA-11. 2. GADDE SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O.NARASIMHA RAO, OCC: BUSINESS R/O.D.NO.67-10-6, 1ST FLOOR, DARSIPET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA-10. 3. REGANDLA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.HUSSAIN RAO, OCC: BUSINESS R/O.D.NO.42-1-1A, SRI SIVA SAI NILAYAM, MASJID LAND, RAMAKRISHNAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-3. 4. DONDABATULA BUCHI BABU, S/O.LATE MADHARAO, OCC: BUSINESS R/O.SRI VENKATA DURGA MOTOR WORKS, PLOT NO.221, 1ST CROSS, 5TH ROAD, JAWAHAR AUTONAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-7. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toset aside the deree and order dated 20.04.2017 passed in Ia No.140/2016 in un-numbered AS No. of 2016 on the file of the Hon'ble II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: It transpires from the record that on 04.08.2017, this Court had directed the petitioner to take out personal notice in respect of the Respondents. Thereafter, the matter was listed to 25.06.2026. On 25.06.2026 at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this matter is posted to 02.07.2026. 2. On 02.07.2026, when a question posted by this Court to the learned counsel for the petitioner about service of notice, learned counsel for petitioner submits that notice not served on the Respondents and the learned counsel did not take any steps from 2017 onwards to serve notice. It seems that the petitioner did not have any interest to prosecute the matter from the date of institution of this C.R.P. Therefore, this Court opines the petitioner utterly failed to comply this Court’s direction, hence this C.R.P is liable to be dismissed. 3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. 4. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 02.07.2026 MNR 4 123 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3834 OF 2017 Dt: 02.07.2026 Mnr