IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87061 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-274 Year-2025 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Jayanti Devi W/o Arjun Yadav R/o Village - Bishambhar Bigha, P.S - Muffasil (Aurangabad), District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Mahendra Yadav S/o Ramdas Yadav R/o Village - Bishambhar Bigha, P.S - Muffasil (Aurangabad), District - Aurangabad 3. Raushan Kumar S/o Mahendra Yadav R/o Village - Bishambhar Bigha, P.S - Muffasil (Aurangabad), District - Aurangabad 4. Ankit Kumar S/o Mahendra Yadav R/o Village - Bishambhar Bigha, P.S - Muffasil (Aurangabad), District - Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Kumari Chandna, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 06-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP of the State. 2. The petitioner has filed the present application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party nos. 2 to 4 by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Aurangabad vide order dated 04.11.2025 passed in A.B.P. No.1963 of 2025. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application for cancellation of bail in order to seek his remedy before Court Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87061 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/2 concerned which has granted anticipatory bail to the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 as his main ground for cancellation of bail is that although injured Arjun Yadav had sustained grievous injuries, however, the same was not taken into consideration, as recorded in the impugned order, on the ground that the injury report of injured Arjun Yadav was not available in the case diary. In such circumstances, the proper and efficacious course would be to approach the court concerned which had granted anticipatory bail to opposite party nos. 2 to 4. 4. With such observation, the present application stands disposed of. Harsh/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T