IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82963 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-368 Year-2025 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada ====================================================== 1. Kundan Singh @ Kundan Kumar S/O Late Brij Kishore Singh Resident Of Village- Runipur, P.s.- Akbarpur, Dist.- Nawada 2. Paramanand Singh @ Paramanand Kumar S/O Late Brij Kishore Singh Resident Of Village- Runipur, P.s.- Akbarpur, Dist.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate For the State : Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP For the Informant : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that Petitioner No. 1 fired from his Katta upon the informant and Petitioner No. 2 assaulted cousin brother of informant, namely Randhir Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82963 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/3 Kumar, by means of spade. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of land dispute between the parties, simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter- case. Though Petitioner No. 1 is alleged to have fired but no one has sustained any fire arm injuries. Petitioner No. 1 has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail and Petitioner No. 2 has got no criminal antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and case and counter-case between the parties, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nawada in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 368 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82963 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 3/3 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T