Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 423 (CAL)

SHAMBHU CHAKRABORTY v. NABA KUMAR GARAI AND ANOTHER

CRR/243/2026 · 2026-04-08

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.04.2026 Sl. no. 34 Ct. No. 42 (Susanta) CRR 243 OF 2026 Shambhu Chakraborty -Vs – Naba Kumar Garai & Anr. Mr. Siddhartha Sarkar, Mr. Sourav Gupta, …for the Petitioner. 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a revision petition before the learned Sessions Court. 2. Liberty is granted. 3. Certified copy, if any, be returned as per the rules. 4. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Since there is a concurrent jurisdiction in the Sessions Court and this Court, the time consumed in filing and pendency of this revision petition be taken into account by the learned Sessions Court while considering the period of limitation. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be in expression on the merits of the case. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all usual requisite formalities. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)