ARINDAM ROY v. THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
WPA/22397/2026 · 2026-09-22
Raja Basu Chowdhury
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42294 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42294 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
25 22.09.2026 sb
Ct.3.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 22397 of 2026
Arindam Roy Versus Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Mr. Kuldip Mallick
Ms. Shetparna Roy
… For the petitioner.
Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee
Mr. Sundar Gopal Bhattacharyya
… For Kolkata Municipal Corporation.
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on record.
2. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and noting that the petitioner has made a representation before the municipal authorities, on 21st July, 2026, appearing at page 23 of the writ petition, I am of the view that the municipal authorities must hear out and dispose of such representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order on an expeditious basis, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order.
3. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file additional documents before the hearing officer.
4. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)