MOHANLAL S/O SHRI RAMNATH MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4057/2026 · 2026-03-06
Anuroop Singhi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4229 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4229 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4057/2026 Mohanlal S/o Shri Ramnath Meena, R/o Village Dobda, Tehsil Ladpura District Kota Rajasthan Through Power Of Attorney Shri Surendra Singh Hada S/o Shri Chandra Singh Hada, Aged 45 Years, R/o Shivpura, Kota, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Kota Development Authority, Kota, Through Its Secretary ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghavendra Singh Khichi For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order 06/03/2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Raghavendra Singh Khichi, at the very outset, submits that the application dated 20.11.2014 filed by the petitioner under Section 90A of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, is pending till date with the respondents and despite the recent representations filed by him on 01.01.2026 and 02.02.2026, no action whatsoever has been taken by the respondents. Thus, it is prayed that the respondents be directed to consider the pending application of the petitioner dated 20.11.2014, expeditiously in accordance with law. Considering the limited submission so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the
[2026:RJ-JP:9557] (2 of 2) [CW-4057/2026] application dated 20.11.2014 filed by the petitioner expeditiously, strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With the abovesaid directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s application strictly in accordance with law and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said application in a particular manner.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /09