2026:JHHC:1991-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) (HB) No.825 of 2025 (D.B) Kailash Ghanshi, Aged about 52 years, S/O: Fagoo Ghanshi, Resident of MQ/DS-353, New Shatri Nagar River Side Near Utkrmit Madhya Vidyalaya, Bermo, Jarangdih P.O.:- Bokaro, P.S: Bokaro, Tharmal, District: Bokaro (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Director General of Police, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi having its office at Police Headquater. P.O- Dhurwa, P.S- Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ranchi, Having its office At: SCR Office, Doranda, Ρ.Ο. +. P.S:- Doranda, District- Ranchi. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Bokaro, having its office at Bokaro, P.O. +P.S+ District- Bokaro. 4. The Officer-in-charge, Bokaro Tharmal, Police Station, Bokaro, Tharmal, Having its office at P.O + P.S: Bokaro Tharmal, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand. 5. Aman Kumar, Son of Sri Sanjiv Hari 6. Rakshit Hari, Son of Sri Sanjiv Hari 7. Sanjiv Hari, Son of not known to the petitioner Resident of Respondent No. 5, 6 & 7 are: H.No. 352, New Shatri Nagar River Side, Bermo, Jarangdih P.O.: Jarangdih, P.S: Bokaro, Tharmal, District: Bokaro (Jharkhand) 8. Imtiyaz Ansari, Son of not known to the petitioner, resident of Double Story, Jarangdih P.O.:- Jarangdih, P.S: Bokaro, Tharmal, District: Bokaro (Jharkhand) … Respondents ---------- 2026:JHHC:1991-DB 2 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Prajapati, Advocate Ms. Laxmi Devi, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Sunita Kumari, AC to Sr. S.C.-II ----- Order No.03/Dated: 27.01.2026 1. The matter was heard on 19.01.2026. The State was called upon to seek instruction and file affidavit. 2. Counter affidavit dated 22.01.2026 has been filed, wherein it has been stated that the girl has solemnized marriage with the respondent no.5, namely, Aman Kumar Hari and to substantiate this statement, the marriage certificate has also been appended being Marriage Certificate No. 802 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on the basis of the averment made in the counter affidavit, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 4. Upon this, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has sought for instruction from his client, who is sitting in the Court, who has given him instruction to withdraw this writ petition. 5. The brothers of the girl, namely, Chandan Ram and Shiv Nandan Ram are sitting in the Court. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and, as such, disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 27th January, 2026 R.K/Rajnish