MD. SHAMIM ANSARY @ SEMI @ SAMIM ANSARI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/2383/2025 · 2026-02-09
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4227 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4227 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
09.02.2026 Serial no. 179 [G.S.D]
CRM (M) 2383 of 2025
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Sessions case No. 255 of 2024 (CIS SC NO. 255/2024) ST No. 14(09)2024 arising out of GR Case No. 2495 of 2024 corresponding to Manickchak PS Case No. 288 of 2024 dt. 18.04.2024.
-And-
In the matter of : Md. Shamim Ansary @ Semi @ Samim Ansari
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. S. Ghosh Mr. Amit Ranjan Pati Ms. Swastika Chowdhury Mr. K. Kubra Ms. Itika Nag Mr. A. Chatterjee Mr. A. Goswami
… for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Arindam Sen Ms. Rita Datta
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 661 days and only 16 witnesses out of 34 witnesses have been examined. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the earlier order, particularly the issue relating to road traffic accident being considered in the petitioner’s bail application by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. Having considered the above, I am of the view that these are issues relating to question of facts which are to be
2 appreciated at the appropriate stage of the trial. This court when the evidence of the prosecution is in progress cannot take the same into consideration. Having regard to the stage of the case, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. However, State is directed to expedite the progress of the trial by fixing a schedule consisting of three dates in a month to take the trial to its logical conclusion. Accordingly, CRM(M) 2383 of 2025 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
3