Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4227 (AP)

PANABAKA VEERASWAMY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9396/2026 · 2026-06-28

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : 07.07.2026 APHC010187382026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9396/2026 Between: 1. PANABAKA VEERASWAMY, S/O SUBBARAMAIAH, AGE 60 YEARS, OCC PANCHAYAT WARD MEMBER, 2. KAMATHAM SUNIL KUMAR,, S/O CHENGAIAH, AGE 35 YEARS, OCC PANCHAYAT WARD MEMBER, 3. GAMPALA SHOBHA,, W/O MUNASWAMY, AGE 38 YEARS, OCC PANCHAYAT WARD MEMBER ALL ARE RESIDENT OF KOTAPOLURU VILLAGE, SULLURPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- 517503 3. TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TUDA, REP. BY ITS VICE-CHAINNAN, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT-517501. 4. THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR, SULLURPET, TIRUPATI DISTRTICT- 524121. 5. THE KOTAPOLURU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KOTAPOLURU VILLAGE, SULLURUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT-524121. 6. PALLAMREDDY HARI PRASAD REDDY, S/O VENKU REDDY, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 27-1-553-3, 1ST LANE, NEAR SP BALA SUBRAMANYAM PARK, ADITYA NAGAR, STONEHOUSE PET, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524 002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondent No.3 in initiating appropriate action against respondent No.6 in respect of unapproved 2 layout to an extent of Ac. 1.5657 cents and to cancel the layout called Sri Lakshmi Sai Nagar Layout laid in an extent of Ac.5.7243 cents situated in Sy.Nos.12-12, 17-1, 17-2 17- 3, 17-4, 17-5 and 21-8 of Kotapoluru village, Sullurupet Mandal, Tirupati District as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently respondent to initiate appropriate action as per rules against the 6th respondent m respect of Sri Lakshmi Sai Nagar Layout and in the mean while direct the 4 respondent not to entertain any sale deeds in respect of the house plots in so called C Block in Sri Lakshmi Sai Nagar Layout in Sy.Nos. 12-12, 17-1 17-2, 17-3, 17-4, 17-5 and 21-8 of Kotapoluru revenue direct the 3 revenue village, Sullurupet Mandal, Tirupati District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct Ihe 3rd respondent to take appropriate action in pursuance of the representation dt.17.11.2025 filed by the petitioners by instructing the 4th respondent not to entertain and register any sale deeds in respect of the house plots in un approved Layout of "C" Block in Sri Lakshmi Sai Nagar Layout situated in Sy.Nos. 12-12, 17-1, 17-2, 17-3, 17-4, 17-5 & 21-8 of Kotapoluru revenue village, Sullurupet Mandal, Tirupati District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V SURENDRA REDDY 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 4. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 5. Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA 6. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.9396 of 2026 ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 29.06.2026 KGM Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 190 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.9396 of 2026 Dated 29.06.2026 KGM