Senpagamoorthi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Karimedu
CRL OP(MD)/12591/2026 · 2026-06-25
R Vijayakumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42262 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42262 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.12591 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD)No.12591 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.12394 and 12395 of 2026 1.Senpagamoorthi
2. Mutheeswaran ... Petitioners/ Accused No.1 & 2 Vs
1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai. (In Crime No.887 of 2022) ... 1st Respondent/ Complainant
2. Muthuraj Working as Head Constable at C.5, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai. ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the C.C.No.2313 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai and quash the same as illegal as against the petitioners. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.12591 of 2026 For Petitioners : M/s.M.Palani For R1 : Mr.Samuel Gunasingh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed by A1 and A2 in C.C.No.2313 of 2025, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein, they are charged with the offences under Sections 419, 468 and 471 of IPC.
2. A perusal of the records reveal that the petitioners herein are accused in another case and in compliance with the bail order granted by the Court they were directed to appear before the second respondent police station regularly. The allegation in the charge sheet is that A1 impersonated A2 and signed the register in the respondent police station, as if A2 was present.
3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, in fact, A2 was also present in the police station on all the days and after four days false complaint case has been lodged. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.12591 of 2026
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and perused the materials available on record.
5. Whether the second petitioner herein was present before the police station on all the days and whether he had signed the register or not, is the subject matter of trial and the same cannot be considered in the quash petition. However, the personal appearance of the petitioners herein shall be dispensed with by the trial Court unless specifically directed to appear before the trial Court.
6. In view of the above said facts, there are no merits in this petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
25.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ebsi 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.12591 of 2026 To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai.
2. The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.12591 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi Crl.O.P(MD)No.12591 of 2026 25.06.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis