PRIYANKA W/O GAURAV YADAV v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
CRLMP/7587/2025 · 2026-04-10
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4225 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4225 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:15110] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7587/2025
1. Priyanka W/o Gaurav Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mandir Ke Pass, Village- Molawas, District Khairthal- Tijara, Rajasthan- 301714 Presently Residing At Hotel The Sara, Refinery Road, Pachpadra, Barmer- 344032.
2. Gaurav Yadav S/o Ratan Lal Yadav, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Mandir Ke Pass, Village- Molawas, District Khairthal- Tijara, Rajasthan- 301714 Presently Residing At Hotel The Sara, Refinery Road, Pachpadra, Barmer- 344032. ----Petitioners Versus Central Bureau Of Investigation, Through Special Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Jaya Mitra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pradeep Choudhary, Spl. PP for CBI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order 10/04/2026 1- ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr izR;FkhZ&lh-ch-vkbZ- dh vksj ls iqfyl Fkkuk Spl. CBI, Jaipur esa iathc) djok;h x;h izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k RC0302025A0005 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 13(2) r/w, 13(1)(a) P.C. Act rFkk 61¼2½] 318 ch-,u-,l- dks fujLr fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA 2- fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dk fuosnu gS fd orZeku ekeys esa ;kphx.k ds fo:) tks vkjksi yxk;s gSa] os feF;k gSaA mUgsa tks vuqfpr ykHk dh jkf'k izkIr gqbZ Fkh] og okfil chek dEiuh dks ykSVk nh x;h gS] var esa mijksDr vk/kkjksa ij ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
[2026:RJ-JP:15110] (2 of 4) [CRLMP-7587/2025] 3- fo}ku fof'k"V yksd vfHk;kstd dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZ fiz;adk dk nsoj rFkk vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZ xkSjo dk HkkbZ v#.k us'kuy ba';ksjsal dEiuh] fHkokMh esa lgk;d ds in ij inLFkkfir Fkk] mlus vius lxs HkkbZ xkSjo dh chek ikWfylh izkIr djus ds ckn mls e`r crkdj ianzg yk[k :i;s Dyse mBk fy;k vkSj bl jkf'k dk ykHk fiz;adk] xkSjo o v#.k rhuksa dks izkIr fd;k x;kA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd vuqla/kku ds ckn fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vkjksi i= is'k fd;k tk pqdk gS] lkFk gh dFku fd;k fd bl ;kfpdk esa tks vk/kkj fy;s x;s gSa] os bl LVst ij lqlaxr ugha gSaA vUr esa ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA 4- nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA 5- orZeku izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj ;g vkjksi gS fd v#.k] us'kuy ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM] fHkokMh esa lgk;d ds in ij dk;Zjr Fkk] mlus ;kstukc) rjhds ls vius thfor HkkbZ xkSjo dks e`r crkdj vuqfpr :i ls chek jkf'k izkIr dh rFkk ;g jkf'k lHkh vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk vuqfpr :i ls izkIr dh x;hA 6- ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk State of Uttar Pradesh and Anrs. Vs. Akhil Sharda and Ors with Sanjeet Jaiswal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 820 ds iSjk la[;k&07 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS%&
"7. Having gone through the impugned judgment and
order passed by the High Court by which the High Court has set aside the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears that the High Court has virtually conducted a mini trial, which as such is not permissible at this stage and while deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As observed and held by this Court in a catena of decisions no mini trial can be conducted by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction and at the stage of deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court
[2026:RJ-JP:15110] (3 of 4) [CRLMP-7587/2025] cannot get into appreciation of evidence of the particular case being considered." 7- blh izdkj ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Kamaladevi Agarwal V. State of W.B. & Ors. (2002) 1 SCC 555 ds iSjk la[;k&07 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS%&
"7. This Court has consistently held that the revisional or inherent powers of quashing the proceedings at the initial stage should be exercised sparingly and only where the allegations made in the complaint or the FIR, even if taken it at the face value and accepted in entirety, do not prima facie discolse the commission of an offence.
Disputed and controversial facts cannot be made the basis for the exercise of the jurisdiction." 8- mijksDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj Li"V gS fd vuqla/kku dh LVst ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr djkus gsrq vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs le; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr vkjksi rFkk vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fy, x;s cpko o vU; lkexzh dh lR;rk] fo'oluh;rk vkfn ds laca/k esa laf{kIr tkap vFkok laf{kIr fopkj.k vuqKs; ugha gSA orZeku ekeys esa izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo izdV gks jgs gSaA ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ U;k;ky;hu izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx djus gsrq ntZ djk;h x;h gks] ,slk Li"V ekeyk ugha gS rFkk yxk;s x;s vkjksi vius vki esa vlaHkkO; gks] ,slh fLFkfr Hkh ugha gSA vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tks cpko fy;s x;s gSa] os vuqla/kku dk fo"k; gks ldrs gSa rFkk ;fn vkjksi i= izLrqr gksus dh fLFkfr esa cpko lk{; ds le; lqlaxr gks ldrs gSaA vfHk;qDr }kjk fy, x;s cpko ek= vk/kkj ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr djus gsrq vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx la;r rjhds ls o iw.kZ lko/kkuh ds lkFk visf{kr gSA lkekU; :i ls tc rd lqn`< vk/kkj ugha gksa]
[2026:RJ-JP:15110] (4 of 4) [CRLMP-7587/2025] vuqla/kku vFkok fopkj.k dh izfdz;k dks jksdk tkuk vFkok ckf/kr fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA 9- mijksDr foospkukuqlkj izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr djus gsrq /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr {ks=kf/kdkfjrk dk iz;ksx gLrxr ekeys esa fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA 10- ifj.kker% ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gS] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDr izdkj ls vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Mittal /42