( 2026:JHHC:1895 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 355 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 355 of 2026 Vikky Ram @ Vikash Kumar @ Vicky Kr. Ravi @ Vikash Kr. Ravi, aged 30 years, S/o Jugal Ram, Village Latu, P.O. & P.S. Bariyatu, District- Latehar, Jharkhand … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shahid Yunus, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P. ----- 02/27.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Keredari P.S. Case No.07 of 2024, registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the allegation of stealing and selling of tractor is not correct. He submits that in view of that, anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the tractor was stolen, which has been sold by the petitioner along with another accused person to another person. She further submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent and that has also come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the allegations are there against the petitioner of stealing of the tractor and further of selling of the said tractor to another person along with one of his accomplice. It ( 2026:JHHC:1895 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 355 of 2026 further transpires that the co-accused persons have taken name of this petitioner. The petitioner is also having criminal antecedent. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and, as such, his prayer for anticipatory bail is, hereby, rejected. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 27th January, 2026 Ajay/