SANDHYA VIJAY MASKE AND ANOTHER v. VIJAY BHASKAR MASKE
APPLN/2709/2026 · 2026-08-25
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4224 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4224 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
*1* 946rev101o26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 101 OF 2026 VIJAY BHASKAR MASKE VERSUS SANDHYA VIJAY MASKE AND ANOTHER ... Shri Kute Rajendra L., Advocate for the Applicant. Shri Rahul P. Cheble, Advocate for the Respondents. ... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2709 OF 2026 IN REVN/101/2026 SANDHYA VIJAY MASKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS VIJAY BHASKAR MASKE … Shri Rahul P. Cheble, Advocate for the Applicants. Shri Kute Rajendra L., Advocate for the respondent. ... CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 25 August 2026 P. C. :-
1. Learned advocate for the applicant/ husband submits that vide order dated 30.03.2026, this Court has directed the applicant to pay monthly maintenance amount before this Court on 10th day of each month and to deposit Rs.50,000/- towards arrears. That maintenance amount comes to Rs.4000/- per month. *2* 946rev101o26 Amount of Rs.50000/- has been deposited by the applicant. 2. Learned advocate for the applicant now makes request that the cheque towards monthly maintenance for the month of August, 2026 may be accepted. 3. Office is directed to accept the said cheque
4. Learned advocate for the respondent/ wife prays for withdrawal of the amount deposited by the applicant in this Court. He submits that out of said wedlock, a child, namely, Viraj is born and therefore, the amount is required for maintenance. 5. Learned advocate for the applicant/ husband strongly opposes the request for withdrawal of amount on the ground that the learned Family Court has not considered evidence in proper perspective. Marriage between the parties itself is disputed and according to him, same has been not at all taken place. As such, the respondent/ wife is not entitled for maintenance from the applicant. 6. The issue as regards marriage between the parties would be considered finally at the time of final disposal of the matter. However, till that time, the respondent/ wife cannot be
*3* 946rev101o26 restrained from availing maintenance deposited by the husband in this Court. 7. It is stated that till now, the amount of around Rs.70000/- has been deposited in this Court. As such, the amount of Rs.35,000/- is permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent/ wife. Accordingly, Criminal Application No.2709/2026 for withdrawal of the amount is disposed of. 8.
At this stage, learned advocate for the respondent/ wife makes a request that the amount permitted to be withdrawn may be transferred to the learned Family Court at Latur and the respondent/wife be permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.35,000/- from the said Family Court. 9. In view of the above specific request, the amount of Rs.35,000/- be transferred to the Family Court at Latur. After such transfer of amount, the respondent/ wife is permitted to withdraw the said amount from the Family Court at Latur. kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )