1 ( 2026:HHC:14226 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 91 of 2026 Decided on: 30.04.2026 ________________________________________________ Heera Singh ....Petitioner Versus Er. Anuj Sharma …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Compliance affidavit has been filed, wherein, it has been stated that the case of the petitioner stands considered by the competent authority vide order dated 13.04.2026, whereby, the petitioner has not been found entitled to extent the benefit of the judgment in Vikas Kumar’s case. 2. Since the case of the petitioner has been considered and rejected by the competent authority, no 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:14226 ) further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail consideration order, i.e. 13.04.2026, in accordance with law, if he is still aggrieved. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 30th April, 2026 Judge (raman)