Aman yadav @ Sanni @ Aman Yadav Sanni v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./88044/2025 · 2026-01-09
Alok Kumar Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42225 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42225 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88044 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2024 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL District- Samastipur ====================================================== Aman yadav @ Sanni @ Aman Yadav Sanni Son of Raj Kumar Ray @ Ram Kumar Rai Resident of village- Jitwapur Bule Chak PS- Samastipur Muffasil Dist -Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 09-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 72 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. 3. As per prosecution case, altogether 23.84 brown sugar along with other apparatus was recovered from the house of apprehended co-accused Vicky Kumar and he disclosed the name of the petitioner and other who fled away from the place of occurrence. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88044 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026 2/4 alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that except disclosure of the said apprehended co-accused, there is nothing on record to demonstrate the complicity of the present petitioner with the alleged occurrence. He further submits that the apprehended co- accused Vicky Kumar, upon whose disclosure the name of the petitioner has been transpired in this case, has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 49328 of 2024 and the case of present petitioner stands on better footing. Hence, petitioner also deserves bail. Petitioner is in custody since 12.08.2025 and he bears no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. Petitioner is not found at the place of occurrence. 5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner by submitting that involvement of petitioner in the present case cannot be outrightly rejected. Hence, he does not deserve bail. 6.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, petitioner is not found at the place of occurrence, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, co-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88044 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026 3/4 accused has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 72 of 2024, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application. (ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88044 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026 4/4 nature of offences in future, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond. alok/- (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) U T