Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42215 (KAR)

SRI.BERIBALLI MUNISHAMI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/29498/2026 · 2026-09-18

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642172026 NC: 2026:KHC:51724 WP No. 29498 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.29498 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.BERIBALLI MUNISHAMI SINCE DECEASED, REP. BY LRS. SRI. SREENIVAS S/O BERIBALLI MUNISHAMI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC :AGRICULTURIST. 2. SRI. BERBALLI CHINNAPPA, S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. 3. SRI. CHIKKA MUNIVENKATAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA, W/O LATE CHIKKA MUNVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 4. SMT. YARRAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS. SRI. RAMESH H, S/O YARRAMMA, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642172026 NC: 2026:KHC:51724 WP No. 29498 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 5. SMT. THIPPAKKA, W/O NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 6. SRI N. SUBBIREDDY, S/O NALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS. 7. SMT. GANGAMMA, W/O DODDAMUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. PETITIONERS NO. 1 TO 7 ARE R/O KAGGALANATTA MJARA VALAGERANAHALLI VILLAGE, BYRAKURU HOBLI, GUDAPALLI POST, MULABAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563101. 8. SMT. PAPAKKA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS. MUNI VENKATAPPA REDD S/O LATE PAPAKKA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 9. SMT. TIRUVALAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS. AMARENDRA, S/O LATE TIRUMALAMMA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642172026 NC: 2026:KHC:51724 WP No. 29498 of 2026 PETITIONERS NO. 8 & 9 ARE R/O GUDAPALLI VILLAGE & POST BYRAKURU HOBLI, MULABAGALA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJA T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, PODIUM BLOCK, VISHVESHVARAIAH TOWER, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR, MULABAGAL ROAD, NH-75, KOLAR – 563101. 3. THAHASHILDAR, DEVANAHALLY TALUK DEVANAHALLY - 562110. 4. SRI VENKATA REDDY SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS. C. VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O CHANGALARAYA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642172026 NC: 2026:KHC:51724 WP No. 29498 of 2026 5. SRI. MYAKALA MUNEPPA SINCE DEEAD BY HIS LRS. SRI SUBRAMANI S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 6. SRI MUDINOORU MUNIVENKATAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR. SRI. KRISHNA REDDY S/O SEETHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 7. SRI. VENKARAMANNA RAYASANDRA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS. SRI. MOHAN REDDY, S/O RAYASANDRA VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 8. SRI AVULA APPANNA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS SRI. APPI REDDY V. S/O DODDA VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 9. SRI KONDANA BOVI SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS. SRI MUNIVENKATANA BOVI S/O VENKATANA BOVI, - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642172026 NC: 2026:KHC:51724 WP No. 29498 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 10. SRI. CHALLA VENKATANA BOVI SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS CHANGALARAYAPPA, S/O POOJARI PEDDANNA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 11. SRI. TIMMANA BOVI SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS. SRI. MARAPPA S/O LATE RAMANA BOVI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 12. SRI. NAGAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR. V. SUBRAMANI S/O CHIKKA VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 12 ARE R/O KAGGALANATTA MAJARA VALAGERANAHALLI VILLAGE, BYRAKURU HOBLI, GUDAPALLI POST, MULABAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT – 563101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19.01.2026 PASSED BY THE 2ND - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642172026 NC: 2026:KHC:51724 WP No. 29498 of 2026 RESPONDENT-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT, IN RAP NO.382/2025, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-K, AS BEING ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioners herein are assailing the order dated 19.01.2026 in RAP No.382/2025 (Annexure-K) passed by respondent No.2 and the RRT proceedings on the file of the Tahsildar, Mulbagil Taluk, Kolar District. 2. Having heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, as respondent No.2 has remitted the matter to the Tahsildar, Kolar Taluk for reconsideration in the light of the observations made by respondent No.2, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. It is also to be noted that there - 7 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642172026 NC: 2026:KHC:51724 WP No. 29498 of 2026 are nine suits pending consideration before the Civil Court in respect of the subject land. 3. In that view of the matter, as the petitioners have to establish right before the jurisdictional Tahsildar, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37