Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4220 (AP)

Sri Sarvaraya Sugars Ltd., v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary,

WP/5277/2016 · 2026-07-02

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010877832016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5277/2016 Between: 1. SRI SARVARAYA SUGARS LTD.,, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER G.KOTESWARA RAO, SIO. VENKATESHWARA RAO ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. CHELLURU VILLAGE, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE (SUGARS) DEPT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF SUGAR AND CANE COMMISSIONER, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH., M.J.ROAD, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 3. THE ASSISTANT CANE COMMISSIONER CANE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SAMALKOT, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE CANE REGULATION INSPECTOR, CANE DEPARTMENT, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to declare the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No. F1/9473/1999 dated 01.04.2015 as illegal, arbitrary, without application of mind and not in accordance with the directions given in W.P.No.22724 of 1999 dated 18.12.1004 and to issue a consequential direction to the lst respondent to refund an amount of Rs.40,15,478.04 ps towards the amount refundable as per the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.903 of 1984 dated 28.04.1999 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 6725 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an earlier date of hearing the writ petition, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP) 2. 15542/GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Ms. Priyanvita, learned counsel representing the Writ Petitioner submits that no cause survives in this Writ Petition, hence no further orders are required in this case. 2. Having so recorded the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 03.07.2026 MNR 4 185 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.5277 OF 2016 Dt: 03.07.2026 Mnr