Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4219 (PAT)

Md. Tauhid v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./28776/2026 · 2026-05-01

Shailendra Singh

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28776 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2650 Year-2019 KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Tauhid S/o Md. Bitu Miyan @ Md. Bittu @ Md. Bittu Miyan Resident of Madhura, P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ansari Khatoon W/o Md. Tauhid, D/o Md. Najrul R/o vill - Madhura, P.S.- Korha, Distt.- Katihar, at present R/o vill- Raghunichak, P.O.- Mansahi, P.s.- Mansahi, Distt.- Katihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Musowir, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 01-05-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with C.A. Case No. 2650/ 2019 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 498A read with 34 of the IPC. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the so called victim and he is innocent and has been falsely implicated due to matrimonial discord. It is further submitted that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is a labourer by profession. It is also submitted that the petitioner has made several efforts to bring back his wife but she refused to come with him and further the allegation Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28776 of 2026(2) dt.01-05-2026 2/2 of demand of dowry and torture against the petitioner is false and concocted. 4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner. 5. In the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the statements made in the petition as well as above submissions, this court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with C.A. Case No. 2650/ 2019 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. BKS/- (Shailendra Singh, J) U T